← All matchups
Apollo Phantom 2.0 vs Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar
The Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar has the longer estimated range — 47.4 miles against 36.8 — because it carries 1800 Wh to the Apollo Phantom 2.0’s 1400. The Apollo Phantom 2.0 is the lighter of the two at 102 lb, which puts it in the rolls only class. Everything else is below.
| Estimated range | 36.8 mi | 47.4 mi |
|---|---|---|
| Claimed range | 50 mi (1.4x the estimate) | 56 mi (1.2x the estimate) |
| Top speed | 44 mph | 53 mph |
| Motor | Dual motor, 3,500 W (3,500 W peak) | Dual motor, 6,700 W (6,700 W peak) |
| Battery | 1400 Wh at 52 V | 1800 Wh at 60 V |
| Wh per dollar | 0.64 Wh/$ | 0.67 Wh/$ |
| Wh per pound | 14 Wh/lb | 17 Wh/lb |
| Weight | 102 lb — rolls only | 107 lb — rolls only |
| Max rider weight | 330 lb | 330 lb |
| Rated grade | 25% | 30% |
| Tires | 11" self-healing | 11" self-healing |
| Suspension | Dual | Dual |
| Brakes | Dual mechanical disc with regen | 4-piston hydraulic discs + regen |
| IP rating | IP66 | IP66 |
| Charge time | 9 h | 10 h |
| Folded size | 51 x 26.6 x 24 in | Folds |
| Lights | Headlight, taillight, turn signals | Beam headlight, taillight, turn signals, side lighting |
| App | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise control | Yes | No |
| Approx. price | ~$2,199 | ~$2,699 |
| Released | 2025 | — |
Apollo Phantom 2.0: the case against
- Mechanical discs where every rival at this price uses hydraulics
- 102 lb and nine hours to charge
- Apollo's support and parts record is the weakest of the performance brands here
- Claimed 50 miles is an eco-mode figure; at 44 mph expect a fraction of it
Apollo Phantom 2.0 Stellar: the case against
- 107 lb, 5 lb more than the Phantom 2.0
- 10-hour charge
- Stated as street tires; not a true off-road tread
- No folded dimensions are published on the product page