← All matchups
Apollo City 2.0 vs Apollo Phantom 2.0
The Apollo Phantom 2.0 has the longer estimated range — 36.8 miles against 34.6 — because it carries 1400 Wh to the Apollo City 2.0’s 864. The Apollo City 2.0 is the lighter of the two at 72 lb, which puts it in the rolls only class. Everything else is below.
| Estimated range | 34.6 mi | 36.8 mi |
|---|---|---|
| Claimed range | 40 mi (1.2x the estimate) | 50 mi (1.4x the estimate) |
| Top speed | 32 mph | 44 mph |
| Motor | Single motor, 1,200 W (1,900 W peak) | Dual motor, 3,500 W (3,500 W peak) |
| Battery | 864 Wh at 48 V | 1400 Wh at 52 V |
| Wh per dollar | 0.62 Wh/$ | 0.64 Wh/$ |
| Wh per pound | 12 Wh/lb | 14 Wh/lb |
| Weight | 72 lb — rolls only | 102 lb — rolls only |
| Max rider weight | 265 lb | 330 lb |
| Rated grade | 36% | 25% |
| Tires | 10" self-healing | 11" self-healing |
| Suspension | Dual | Dual |
| Brakes | Dual drum with regenerative braking | Dual mechanical disc with regen |
| IP rating | IP66 | IP66 |
| Charge time | 6 h | 9 h |
| Folded size | Folds | 51 x 26.6 x 24 in |
| Lights | Headlight, taillight, turn signals | Headlight, taillight, turn signals |
| App | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise control | Yes | Yes |
| Approx. price | ~$1,399 | ~$2,199 |
| Released | 2025 | 2025 |
Apollo City 2.0: the case against
- Drums rather than discs: less bite than the hydraulic discs some rivals fit at this price
- 72 lb, so it lives at ground level
- Too new for an independent range test or a long-term record
Apollo Phantom 2.0: the case against
- Mechanical discs where every rival at this price uses hydraulics
- 102 lb and nine hours to charge
- Apollo's support and parts record is the weakest of the performance brands here
- Claimed 50 miles is an eco-mode figure; at 44 mph expect a fraction of it